A SMALL AND COMPACT HYBRID ANTENNA SYSTEM FOR 144 MHz

Slobodan Bukvić, YU7XL, http://www.qslnet.de/member/yu7xl/

 

My recent VHF antenna was a system consisting of sixteen 8-ele yagi antennas, each 2WL long, my own design. Before it, I was using 4x14 ele yagi by YU7EF, each 4.5WL long.

There are many pro et contras for each of these antennas.

The 16-antenna version had higher gain, but higher temperature, too. The main disadvantage is that this configuration requests 5 power dividers (3 at least), which means more energy loss and failure possibilities.

I found the best advantage of 16 small antennas is their behaviour under windy condition. Antennas are self supporting, showing good balance and resistance against wind. Without practical experience I could not believe this, but I was using this antenna system for several years with no wind problems at all.

An American EME ham, getting known that I worked with 16 short antennas, told me: `much aluminum…..`. I disagree, such a system does not contain more aluminum, and is not more expensive at all, than a system of 4 long antennas.

Now I want to describe a realy small antenna system for those who like `do it yourself` building. The antenna is as short as 2785 milimetres, which allows using plastic boom (fishing rod). Such antennas can be mounted in front of supporting frame. Therefore, the antenna can easily be switched between H and V polarisation, keeping good performance in both planes. Finally, fishing rod does not require boom correction, which means good reproducibility. This is also preserved with good broadband antenna characteristics.

 

ANTENNA QY20806XL4D3

Figure 1 – Outlook of the antenna

 

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

12.76

21.50

20.74

17.15

43.5

48.7

260.4

-11.40

141.300-147.200

Loss included

12.71

21.46

20.69

17.13

43.5

48.7

260.8

-11.45

 

Table 1 -  Performance of the antenna

 

                       

 

mm

Re

De1

De2

D1

D2

D3

DQ4

DQ5

DQ6

Position

0

190

330

421

715

1095

1565

2231

2785

Length

1012

1006

886

942

930

906

538

524

504

All elements made of aluminum tube Ψ6 milimeters

Height of oblong elements 250 milimetres

All dimensions given in milimeters

 

Table 2 – Building details

Remarks:

Radiator is made in trapeze (LFA) form, where feedpoints are located on the center of De2 , with 10 mm gap which should be deducted from the complete radiator length, as the following figure shows:

Figure 2 – LFA radiator

 

Figure 3 - Radiation patterns in H and V plane (loss included for aluminum)

 

Figure 4a – Frequency diagram for SWR=1.5

 

Figure 4b - SWR diagram from 144.000 – 146.000 MHz

 

ANTENNA QY20806XL7D3 IN STACK

Every individual antenna has its own stacking properties which cannot be forecasted, neither by someone`s thinking nor by experience. The best way to choose the best stacking distances is to make a stacking table by NEC/EZNEC. The table for QY20806XL7D3 is as follows:

VERTICAL
 DISTANCE (cm)

G
(dB)

TA
(°K)

G/T
(dB)

HORIZONTAL
DISTANCE (cm)

G
(dB)

TA
(°K)

G/T
(dB)

100

14.05

232.2

-9.61

100

 

 

 

110

14.23

227.3

-9.34

110

13.72

269.3

-10.58

120

14.38

225.3

-9.15

120

13.97

262.6

-10.22

130

14.50

226.5

-9.05

130

14.17

258.2

-9.95

140

14.60

229.9

-9.02

140

14.34

255.3

-9.73

150

14.69

233.4

-8.99

150

14.49

253.7

-9.55

160

14.78

235.8

-8.95

160

14.62

253.2

-9.41

170

14.87

237.7

-8.89

170

14.74

253.6

-9.30

180

14.96

239.3

-8.83

180

14.85

254.6

-9.21

190

15.05

239.9

-8.75

190

14.96

256.1

-9.12

200

15.15

239.5

-8.64

200

15.06

257.8

-9.05

210

15.26

238.9

-8.52

210

15.15

259.5

-8.99

220

15.36

238.9

-8.42

220

15.24

261.1

-8.93

230

15.46

239.9

-8.34

230

15.32

262.6

-8.87

240

15.55

242.2

-8.29

240

15.40

263.8

-8.81

250

15.62

245.6

-8.28

250

15.47

264.6

-8.76

260

15.68

249.9

-8.30

260

15.53

265.2

-8.71

270

15.73

254.6

-8.33

270

15.58

265.6

-8.66

280

15.77

259.4

-8.37

280

15.63

265.6

-8.61

290

15.80

264.1

-8.42

290

15.67

265.5

-8.57

300

15.82

268.3

-8.47

300

15.70

265.1

-8.53

310

 

 

 

310

15.72

264.6

-8.51

320

 

 

 

320

15.74

264.1

-8.48

330

 

 

 

330

15.75

263.4

-8.46

340

 

 

 

340

15.76

262.8

-8.44

350

 

 

 

350

15.77

262.1

-8.42

360

 

 

 

360

15.77

261.5

-8.41

370

 

 

 

370

15.77

261.0

-8.40

 

Table 3 – Stacking distances of QY20806XL7D3

 

When planning an antenna system you have to look at the table and to choose whether you want to get the best temperature or the maximum gain, or something in between. I suggest choosing the best G/T ratio. Of course, one can be limited with available space in his house yard. If so, it is a good idea to see stacking tables for various antennas and to choose the antenna first. Keep in mind that too small distances can cause SWR changes.

Note, the table becomes invalid if anything in antenna dimensions has changed.

 

ANTENNAS QY20806XL7D3 IN VERTICAL STACK

As you see in the stacking table, the minimum temperature for this  antenna in vertical stack is around 0.55λ, and this distance is common for most antennas. Such a small distance is not payable because the associated gain is 1.65 dB only over a single antenna. Therefore, we have to choose the distance giving higher gain, sacrificing temperature in a certain extent. Here I choose the distance which gives the best G/T, and it is 240 cm.

Here are the results:

A)    Two antennas verticaly

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

15.60

22.36

23.31

12.93

43.6

22.4

241.8

-8.23

140.600-147.300

Loss included

15.56

22.32

23.26

12.96

43.5

22.4

242.4

-8.29

 

Table 4 – Performances of two antennas stacked vertically at 240 cm

 

Figure 5 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of two antennas stacked vertically at 240 cm

Figure 6 -  SWR diagrams for SWR=1.5

B)    Four antennas verticaly

Now I took the stacking distance to be 250 cm. Therefore, the total height of the antenna system is 7.5 m.

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

18.66

25.69

26.88

12.88

43.6

11.2

230.4

-4.96

140.700-147.200

Loss included

18.61

23.62

24.78

12.62

44.0

10.1

231.2

-5.03

 

Table 5 – Performances of four antennas stacked vertically at 250 cm distance

 

Figure 7 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of four antennas stacked vertically at 250 cm

Figure 8 -   Frequency diagram for SWR=1.5

 

 

ANTENNAS QY20806XL7D3 IN H-STACK

Horizontal only stack is not used, even, not recommended, because it requests more space and more work for the same results than with vertical stack. Furthermore, antenna temperature is unacceptable high within small and moderate stacking distances. Instead, there are usualy H-stacks consisted of two vertically and two horizontally stacked antennas. I choose vertical distance of 240 cm and horizontal of 310 cm. This should give the maximum G/T. (Actually, the stacking table says that maximum G/T is at 360 cm, but there is no gain increase above 310 cm).

 

 

A)    Four antennas in H-stack, V=240cm, H=310cm

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

18.66

22.11

9.02

12.78

17.8

22.4

245.3

-5.24

141.300-147.200

Loss included

18.61

22.05

9.04

12.80

17.8

22.5

245.8

-5.30

 

Table 6 – Performances of four antennas in H stack at 240x310 cm

 

 

Figure 9 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of four antennas in H stack

 

Figure 10 -  Frequency diagrams for SWR=1.5

 

B)    Eight antennas in H-stack, V=240+240+240cm, H=310cm

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

21.64

22.67

7.52

12.63

16.2

10.6

232.9

-2.03

140.300-146.900

Loss included

21.59

22.63

7.53

12.63

16.2

10.6

233.6

-2.12

Note, this system is as small as 7.2x3.1 metres

Table 7 – Performances of eight antennas stacked vertically at 240 cm and horizontally 310 cm

 

 

Figure 11 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of eight antennas in H stack

 

Figure 12 -  Frequency diagram for SWR=1.5

 

 

C)    Sixteen antennas in H-stack, V=250+250+250cm, H=250+250+250cm

In order to take the maximum of short sixteen antennas, vertical and horizontal stacking distances are chosen to be 250 cm. Now you have a system of 7.5 x7.5 meters from boom to boom, giving quite respectable gain.

 

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

No loss

24.50

26.60

13.10

12.86

10.0

10.2

229.3

+0.90

140.300-147.200

Loss included

24.45

24.49

13.10

12.86

10.0

10.2

230.1

+0.83

 

Table 8 – Performances of sixteen antennas stacked vertically and horizontally at 250 cm

 

 

Figure 13 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of sixteen antennas in H stack (no loss)

 

 

 

Figure 14 – Radiation patterns in H and V planes of sixteen antennas in H stack (loss included)

 

 

ANTENNA QY20806XL7D3 FOR X POL

A big advantage of hybrid antennas is their easy adaptation for cross polarisation. Quad/oblong loops are by their nature ready to work in both polarisation planes. You only have to build another set of yagi elements and to put them on the boom in perpendicular positions.

Though not quite necessary, I wanted to optimize vertical elements additionally. As seen from the table 8, vertical elements are placed 20 milimetres shifted in X-axe. This finally have a bit lower gain, compared to horizontal part of the antenna, but better temperature and, even, better G/T. The working bandwidth became bigger, too. Of course, this what is considered horizontal can be turned to vertical and opposite, the choice is yours.

 

 

 

CONDITION

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

H-POL

No loss

12.76

21.50

20.74

17.15

43.5

48.7

260.4

-11.40

141.300-147.200

Loss incl.

12.71

21.46

20.69

17.13

43.5

48.7

260.8

-11.45

V-POL

No loss

12.64

20.25

18.14

22.57

49.7

44.2

252.4

-11.38

141.300-147.900

Loss incl.

12.59

20.20

18.12

22.52

49.7

44.2

253.0

-11.44

 

Table 9 – Performances of horizontal and vertical part of the antenna

 

Figure 15 -  Radiation patterns in H and V planes of the vertical part of the antenna

Figure 16 -  Frequency diagrams for SWR=1.5 of the vertical antenna part

 

QY20806XL7D3

Re

De1

De2

D1

D2

D3

DQ4

DQ5

DQ6

H-POL

Position

0

190

330

421

715

1095

1565

2231

2785

Length

1012

1006

886

942

930

906

538

524

504

V-POL

Position

20

210

350

441

735

1115

Same

Same

Same

Length

1016

1006

886

940

932

906

 

Table 10 – Building details for horizontal and vertical elements

Figure 17 -  Radiation patterns in H and V planes of the vertical part of the antenna system, no loss

Figure 18 - Radiation patterns in H and V planes of the vertical part of the antenna system, loss included

 

QY20806XL7D3

XPOL

G (dBi)

F/B (dB)

F/Sh (dBi)

F/Sv (dBi)

Hor (◦)

Ver (◦)

Temp (◦K)

G/T (dB)

Δf for SWR=1.5 (MHz)

H-pol

No loss

24.50

26.60

13.10

12.86

10.0

10.2

229.3

+0.90

140.300-147.200

Loss included

24.45

24.49

13.10

12.86

10.0

10.2

230.1

+0.83

V-pol

No loss

24.41

24.31

12.79

13.07

10.2

10.0

222.2

+0.94

140.300-147.900

Loss included

24.36

24.22

12.79

13.07

10.2

10.0

223.1

+0.87

 

Table 11 – Performances of horizontal and vertical part of the antenna system

 

CONCLUSION

This antenna is modelled for different purposes and could be used as a powerful system for  EME, as well as for normal DX-ing or contesting.

Anyway, feeding coaxial cable 50 Ώ should be connected to feedpoints, together with λ/2 balun, 1:4 ratio, because the antenna impedance is 200 Ώ. If the XPOL version used, two coaxial cables are needed, and they must be positioned behind the antenna, out of radiation fields. Also, keep in mind that XPOL elements must cross each other in their centerlines!

I tried also a simulation of the loop elements of this antenna in diamond quad form (see figure 19) , and got a bit better performance. I did not include it, wishing not to make the article more complex and confusing, and it is available by e-mail request from the authoe.

Figure 18 – Diamond quad loop shape

 

Note: Currently the author is constructing the here described system with 16 antennas and will test it on EME when ready. All data in this artickle are basing upon computer simulations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16-stack at 260x280: G=24.78 dBi, TA=234.0 K, G/T=+1.09